Many players use certain strategies to increase their chances of winning. Even if some of these techniques seem sensible at first, it must be said clearly: They do not lead to reliable profits. However, it is often said that a certain strategy will work after all. Before using this strategy, however, you should read this article first.
How can you be so sure that a winning strategy won't work? Well, if it worked, all gamblers would be rich and all casinos would be bankrupt. Even so, it makes sense to look at the individual winning strategies and analyze why they don't work.
Increase the stake in winning
Here, when you win, the profit is set again. The idea behind this is that you can make high stakes relatively " safely " - after all, the stake is the profit you just made, which is now invested.
In fact, the stake is always your own money . Although it was only recently won, it is your own money - the fact that you have only recently owned it does not change that.
Stop as soon as profit is made
At first glance, the strategy looks promising. It is common knowledge that long-term wins are not possible - after several games the losses pile up.
You want to get around this principle by playing disciplined and stopping after winning the day. This ensures profit and prevents what has been achieved from being gambled away.
The idea is good, but it cannot be used in practice. It would mean never playing again after winning . Even if you only won € 1, you should never dare to play again. Only lifelong abstinence from gambling would secure your profit and you would be one of the few people who would have won long-term at gambling.
But as soon as you play again the next day or the next time you visit the casino, the strategy no longer works: the casino doesn't care whether you play 100 games in one day or 1 game in 100 days. Interrupting the game will only delay the loss, but it will not result in a profit.
Martingale strategy
The Martingale strategy works according to a simple pattern: If a game is lost, the stake is doubled to make up for the loss. The strategy is known by many players and is applied in different forms.
The different variants of the Martingale strategy differ mainly in the extent of the increase or decrease in the event of a profit or loss. They are easy to recognize by a typical characteristic: the stake must be increased after a loss .
Some variants of the Martingale strategy seem to be safer, they increase the stake comparatively slowly. But the same applies here: none of the strategies enables long-term success.
Analysis of the results so far
Many players believe that games played in a row are related. In fact, this assumption is wrong; the outcome of a game is independent of the previous (and subsequent) game rounds.
For example, after a series of lost games, it is often thought that a profit would inevitably result. If, for example, red fell 5 times in a row in roulette , black would soon have to be hit (to compensate for the overload of red ).
However, such assumptions are wrong. Most games of chance are independent of each other. The outcome of one game does not affect the outcome of the next.
Most players know that the chances of winning cannot theoretically be influenced, but do not feel it in practice. Unfortunately, the subjective feeling doesn't change the outcome of the game.
A common objection is that if there are enough games, each event must occur the same number of times (e.g. red / black in roulette). If you were to observe over a few games that a certain event (e.g. red ) occurs less frequently than average, it would have to occur more than average in the near future.
However, this view is not complete: First of all, the “ near future ” is not defined more precisely. So a “ compensation ” would only be conceivable in weeks or months. In addition, the time and period of the analysis are freely selected. It is possible that the result of the analysis would be different if it had been started 2 days earlier.
Specific winning strategies
Lotto winning strategy
Blackjack winning strategy
Winning strategy machines
Roulette winning strategy
House rules and rule variants
카지노사이트 providers often have their own house rules. Various aspects of the games of chance offered can thus easily be changed. The rules can be interpreted by the operator to the advantage or disadvantage of the player. The same applies here: Even the most player-friendly rules do not allow long-term profit .
Player-friendly rules should give the player the impression of a good offer. However, it does not help the player himself, he loses even with the " best " provider.
Side bets
In some games there are side bets or " insurance " on a certain course of the game or the outcome of the game. Some winning strategies advise against these side bets, others see a benefit under certain conditions. But here, too, the following applies: Although the probability of winning can increase, the expected profit is still negative - a loss is inevitable in the long term.
Don't make rash side bets. In most cases, this reduces the probability of winning and accelerates the long-term losing even more.
Combination of different winning strategies
It sounds obvious: If a winning strategy increases the probability of winning, a combination of several winning strategies should be even better. So would a combination of optimal house rules, correct increase of the stake and ideal side bets make a profit possible?
No, even a combination of different techniques cannot increase the probability of winning enough. Even under ideal circumstances, there is always a long-term loss.
Then why winning strategies?
In fact, a winning strategy can make a difference: your chances of winning go from “ bad ” to “ still bad, but not that bad ”.
However, a winning strategy would only make sense in the long term if it could actually bring the expected average profit into positive territory. Unfortunately, this does not manage to play. Years ago there may have been certain combinations of game strategy and house rules that would theoretically have made long-term profits possible, but these were eliminated by changes in the rules.
Here is an example:
Suppose you use a winning strategy to increase the probability of winning from 0.8 to 0.9.
Nevertheless, the probability of winning is not in the positive range. So in the long run you will continue to lose - slower, but still.
At the end of the day, you don't notice any benefit from winning strategies: whatever “ saved ” in losses is lost again through more frequent gaming.
Who are winning strategies for?
In fact, these strategies are often advertised to give the player a sense of control and thus motivate them to bet higher. However, it makes no difference to the casinos whether you use a winning strategy, after all, the casino wins anyway.
In the online area in particular, there are various websites with good “ tips ” and “ advice ” for successful gaming. This should give the impression of being in good hands and luring the player to their own game offerings.
Sometimes they even try to sell a " secret " winning strategy. In no case do not get involved in such a deal.